The aim of the research is to shed light on one of the most important important evideence or proofs of the philosopher Thomas Aquinas inferred his five logical arguments regarding the proof of the existence of God to his existence by pure mental evidence far from the source of revelation and derived from the natural world that his five evidence is under the banner of cosmological evidence (cosmological) and different from Existenial evidence in the fact that it a dimensional arguments and not tribal any starting from the experience and viewing in the outside world and not confined to the mental world Hence came the rejection of Thomas Aquinas ontological existential evidence presented by his predecessors on the existence of God explaining the error of evidence especially those that rely on lmagine Vahtam instead of cosmic evidence emanating from empirical data and ends with the substantiation of a bug being the duty of existence itself After that proved the existence of Aquinas first bug It ended up being the one that we cannot imagine greater than which we can not imagine does not exist Despite the opposition evidence was strong and effective in his time The evidence of its survival to this day.